Whiff.

Manufacturer record

Solid Gold Pet, LLC

Parent: Health & Happiness · No owned plants

Nutritionist
Unknown
Quality control
Claimed (unverified)
Publishes research
No
Transparency
Partial
Owns its plants
No / co-packs
Credibility score
7 / 20

Credibility scored on the 20-point WSAVA tier, Medium confidence. An unverified field scores at half credit, never zero. How this feeds the grade →

Brands they own

Solid Gold · WolfKing · WolfCub · NutrientBoost · Love at First Bark · SeaMeal

Recall history

DateClassWhatBrands named
2012-05IPossible Salmonella contamination. Solid Gold voluntarily recalled two batches of dry dog food after being notified by its co-packer DIAMOND PET FOODS of Salmonella at Diamond's Gaston, SC plant. This is an INHERITED co-pack recall, i.e. Solid Gold's slice of the multi-brand 2012 Diamond Salmonella Infantis recallSolid Gold WolfKing, Solid Gold WolfCub

Recall events in the last 10 years weigh most; older events decay. Repeat events in the 10-year window: 0.

The detail

qualified_nutritionist=unknown / who_formulates=unknown: Solid Gold's website CLAIMS 'All Solid Gold dry dog foods on the market today were formulated by a Nutritionist with a PhD in animal nutrition', but the nutritionist is UNNAMED, the claim does not state full-time-staff vs consultant, and it is not third-party verified. The company spokesperson named in trade press is Leasa Moltke, 'Manager of Nutrition and Regulatory Affairs' (a regulatory/marketing role, not a stated PhD/ACVN credential). Authoritatively, in the Pet Nutrition Alliance 'Dare to Ask' 2023 WSAVA manufacturer report, Solid Gold answered 'Did not respond' to every column: whether a contract manufacturer is used, whether a Nutritional Expert/qualified nutritionist is used in manufacturing, what percent of plants are company-owned, and nutrient-analysis. So under the WSAVA gold standard (a named full-time PhD-in-Animal-Nutrition or ACVN/ECVCN diplomate, disclosed publicly) the nutritionist and formulation fields stay 'unknown' rather than credited (an unverified, unnamed marketing PhD claim, plus a declined WSAVA questionnaire). substantiation_policy=unknown: Solid Gold did not respond to the PNA questionnaire and does not disclose feeding-trials-vs-formulation per line; labels are likely 'formulated to meet AAFCO profiles' (formulation-only) but left unknown for lack of a clean source. qc=claimed: Solid Gold self-reports a 'positive release' program (batch samples lab-tested for pathogens such as Salmonella) and a minimum 185F kill step (FAQ), but this is self-reported and, critically, the actual plant QC for the US dry food is DIAMOND'S (the co-packer), whose program is itself only 'claimed'/opaque and failed the 2012 FDA Gaston-SC inspection, so QC is 'claimed', not independently 'documented'. publishes_research=no: no peer-reviewed nutrition research program was found; H&H/Solid Gold cite a global 'R&D centers' marketing structure but publish no research (unlike Hill's/Purina/Royal Canin). transparency=partial: Solid Gold DOES answer manufacturing-country, QC-approach, recall-history and a nutritionist claim publicly on its FAQ (more open than a fully opaque maker), but it declined the standard WSAVA/PNA questionnaire, does not name its nutritionist, and does not name its co-manufacturer (Diamond), so 'partial' rather than 'answers-publicly'.

Sources

AI-assisted research, pending human review · 2026-07-05